Can ASML Secure Europe's Tech Sovereignty?

Introduction
The semiconductor industry is the new strategic battleground. These tiny chips power everything from our smartphones to our defence systems, making them critical for economic growth and national security (Chapman, 2024). Recent global events, like the COVID-19 pandemic and rising geopolitical tensions, have exposed the fragility of the semiconductor supply chain (Xiong et al., 2024).

Amidst this global power rivalry, the European Union is striving for "technological sovereignty" (Csernatoni, 2022; Falkner et al., 2024). Heavily dependent on foreign semiconductor manufacturing, the EU has launched initiatives like the European Chips Act to boost its own production capabilities. At the heart of this ambition is the Dutch company ASML, the world's only manufacturer of the advanced Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines necessary for producing the most advanced chips (Weil et al., 2024).

While ASML is a critical European asset, this brief argues that the path to the EU's technological sovereignty is constrained by the complex web of global interdependencies in the semiconductor industry, particularly the significant influence of the United States (Monsees, 2024).

The EU's Push for Technological Sovereignty
Technological sovereignty is the ability of a state to control critical technologies according to its own interests and values (Falkner et al., 2024; Hummel et al., 2021). For the EU, this means reducing its vulnerability to external pressures, enhancing its economic competitiveness, and protecting its democratic values.

This goal has led to a more interventionist industrial policy, a "geo-dirigiste" shift from the EU's traditional market-based approach (Seidl and Schmitz, 2024; Di Carlo and Schmitz, 2023). The EU is now actively directing investment into strategic sectors through programs like the EU Chips Act, which aims to reduce reliance on foreign chip manufacturers (Di Carlo and Schmitz, 2023).

A Tangled Global Supply Chain
The semiconductor supply chain is incredibly complex and globalized (Chapman, 2024). It involves highly specialized companies scattered across Europe, North America, and East Asia, each focusing on a specific stage of production. This creates vulnerabilities, as natural disasters, pandemics, or geopolitical events can have a ripple effect across the entire globe, leading to chip shortages (Xiong et al., 2024).

Several key players dominate the industry: 

• ASML: This Dutch company has a near-monopoly on the EUV lithography machines essential for cutting-edge chips (Weil et al., 2024).

• TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company): The world's largest contract manufacturer, TSMC produces chips for many leading companies using designs provided by its clients (Malkin and He, 2024).

This concentration of power is further complicated by geopolitics, especially the US-China tech rivalry. The U.S. has used its influence to restrict China's access to advanced semiconductors, pressuring allies like the Netherlands to limit ASML's sales to Chinese firms (Malkin and He, 2024).

ASML: Europe's Strength and Limitation
ASML is undoubtedly Europe's prized possession in the tech industry. Its cutting-edge technology gives the EU a significant competitive advantage and can help attract investment and top talent. By providing EU-based chipmakers with the tools to produce advanced semiconductors, ASML can help reduce the bloc's reliance on foreign manufacturers like TSMC (Monsees, 2024).

However, ASML's strength is also a potential weakness. The EU's reliance on a single company, no matter how advanced, is risky and could stifle broader European competition. Furthermore, ASML itself is not fully independent. It relies on US suppliers and is subject to U.S. extraterritorial influence, where the American government can exert legal and financial pressure on its business decisions (Malkin & He, 2024).

The election of Donald Trump could exacerbate this issue. A transactional, bilateral approach could lead to further restrictions on technology sharing or even sanctions if the EU's push for sovereignty is seen as a threat to American dominance.

The Path Forward: Diversification and Strategic Partnerships
To truly achieve technological sovereignty, the EU cannot rely on ASML alone. A multi-faceted strategy is needed:

• Diversify the Supply Chain: The EU must invest in alternative suppliers and technologies to reduce its dependence on any single point in the supply chain. This could involve supporting smaller suppliers, though this requires significant investment (Ye, 2022).

• Foster "Friend-Shoring": Deepening partnerships with trusted allies like Japan can help secure supply chains, share the costs of research and development, and create a united front against coercive economic practices (Carver, 2024).

• Leverage Other Strengths: The EU is a leader in specific chip applications and has significant regulatory power, which it can use to shape global standards (Hummel et al., 2021). By investing in research and education, the EU can also become a hub for semiconductor talent and innovation, aligning with the "developmental network state" model (Di Carlo and Schmitz, 2023).

Conclusion
ASML provides the EU with a crucial foundation for building its technological independence, but it cannot singlehandedly guarantee it. The complexities of the global semiconductor industry, coupled with geopolitical pressures from both rivals and allies, mean that the EU's path to sovereignty will be challenging (Monsees, 2024).

The EU must adopt a comprehensive strategy that diversifies its capabilities, fosters international cooperation, and leverages its unique strengths. The election of Donald Trump is a stark reminder of the shifting geopolitical landscape. The EU must act decisively to protect and support its prized technological assets, or its ambitions of technological sovereignty, envisioned in the Chips Act, may become a story of a missed opportunity.


Citations
Banerjee, S. and Sharma, A.K., 2015. Co-creation as a risk-sharing strategy for the development of innovative EUV lithography technology in the semiconductor industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), pp.1097-1113.

Carver, Julia. 2024. More Bark than Bite? European Digital Sovereignty Discourse and Changes to the European Union's External Relations Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), pp.2250-86.

Chapman, B., 2024. Recent U.S. Government and foreign national government and commercial literature on semiconductors. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 29(2), pp.94-124.

Di Carlo, D. and Schmitz, L., 2023. Europe first? The rise of EU industrial policy promoting and protecting the single market. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(10), pp.2063-2096. 

Falkner, G., Heidebrecht, S., Obendiek, A., and Seidl, T., 2024. Digital sovereignty-Rhetoric and reality. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), pp.2099-2120.

Hummel, D., Falkner, G., and Newman, A. L., 2021. The turn to digital sovereignty: A discursive institutionalist analysis of EU digital policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(10), pp.1537-1556. 

Malkin, A. and He, T., 2024. The geoeconomics of global semiconductor value chains: extraterritoriality and the US-China technology rivalry. Review of International Political Economy, 31(2), pp.674-699.

McNamara, K.R., 2024. Transforming Europe? The EU's industrial policy and geopolitical turn. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(9), pp.2371-2396.

Monsees, Linda. 2024. The Paradox of Semiconductors EU Governance between Sovereignty and Interdependence. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 37(1), pp.29-40. 

Seidl, Timo, and Luuk Schmitz. 2024. Moving on to Not Fall Behind? Technological Sovereignty and the 'Geo-Dirigiste' Turn in EU Industrial Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), pp.2147-74.

Weil, Steffi (Stefanie), Joern Carsten Gottwald, and Markus Taube. 2024. The European Union, Taiwan, and the Silicon Shield Argument: A Conceptual Assessment through the Lens of Grand Theories. European Politics and Society, November, pp.1-26.

Xiong, Wei, David D. Wu, and Jeff H. Y. Yeung. 2024. Semiconductor Supply Chain Resilience and Disruption: Insights, Mitigation, and Future Directions. International Journal of Production Research, August, pp.1-34.

Ye, T., 2022. The roots of great power competition: An analysis based on the increasing returns mechanism. Social Sciences in China, 43(4), pp.77-97.